Recently, Chuck Colson (founder of Prison Fellowship Ministries and BreakPoint), a man who has been greatly used by God and that I greatly respect and admire, published this article concerning Quebec. To begin, I greatly appreciate Chuck Colson and his tremendous influence, testimony, and resources.
A friend e-mailed the link to this article, and no, this is not news to me, this article reflects my daily life. Factually, most of what is stated in the article reflects our daily experience here in Quebec.
However,
I think this article is also unintentionally propogating a potential misconception of
Quebec. In the article we get the impression that Quebec is a society
that rejected God, thus... the consquences of said rejection.
Here is the problem: Quebec is a society that never knew God in the first
place. What Quebec rejected was a nearly all-powerful and abusive
Catholic church... not God Himself. (We must, as well, not make a
direct correlation between the Catholic church in the U.S. and the
Catholic church in Quebec. These are two very different expressions in
two very different contexts. Don't make the mistake of looking at a
local Catholic church in Oregon and say "It doesn't seem to me that the
Catholic church was abusive". Many, many Americans have responded thus,
but they have never experienced the pre-1960's Quebecker expression of
the Catholic church).
Yes,
Quebec, prior to the 1960's was close to one of the most religious
societies on the planet with over 90% of the population being
practicing Catholic. However, during that same epoch evangelical
missionaries were thrown in prison, their cars burned, their church
windows broken, priests proclaimed that "if you read the Bible you will
go crazy" (that's a translated quote from my mother-in-law), priests
witholding communion from couples who wanted to stop at 6 children, etc. (Continued below...)
Here
is how I see it: I think of the story of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11-31). In that
story we have two sons... one that lets his irreligion separate him
from his father, the second (older) lets his religion separate him from
his father. The younger, it's obvious, squandered his life with
outright sin and rebellion. The older did all the right stuff... but
not as a result of his communion with his father, but because he too
wanted his father's stuff (I thank Tim Keller for pointing this out).
I
see Quebec pre-1960's as a societal equivalent to the older son: very
religious, and simultaneously very separated from the father. Then, as
a result of the Quiet Revolution, Quebec has become the younger son,
equally cut off from communion from it's father by outright rebellion.
The
danger I see is this desire to "go back to the good old days" when
Quebec was more moral, etc. However, in the "good old days", I would
highly doubt that a higher percentage of Quebeckers passed from this
life into communion with our Heavenly Father than in today's outright
rebellion.
We desire the beginning of a new period of Quebecker history, one that has never before existed.
Anyway, that's my two cents for a Monday.
-Rob